Lisping is a functional speech disorder affecting accurate pronunciation of /s/ and /z/ sounds, impacting up to 23% of patients seen by speech-language pathologists. Four distinct types exist—frontal, lateral, palatal, and dental—each requiring specific tongue placement therapy. Treatment typically begins between ages 3-8, depending on lisp type, with lateral and palatal lisps requiring the earliest intervention, as children don’t outgrow these developmental patterns.
- Emerson College - Master's in Speech-Language Pathology online - Prepare to become an SLP in as few as 20 months. No GRE required. Scholarships available.
- Grand Canyon University - Online Master of Science in Speech-Language Pathology. - This STEM program focuses on training aspiring speech-language pathologists to offer compassionate, effective services to individuals with communication disorders
- Arizona State University - Online - Online Bachelor of Science in Speech and Hearing Science - Designed to prepare graduates to work in behavioral health settings or transition to graduate programs in speech-language pathology and audiology.
- NYU Steinhardt - NYU Steinhardt's Master of Science in Communicative Sciences and Disorders online - ASHA-accredited. Bachelor's degree required. Graduate prepared to pursue licensure.
- Pepperdine University - Embark on a transformative professional and personal journey in the online Master of Science in Speech-Language Pathology program from Pepperdine University. Our program brings together rigorous academics, research-driven faculty teaching, and robust clinical experiences, all wrapped within our Christian mission to serve our communities and improve the lives of others.
“I learned nothing about remediating lisps in grad school! How could this be?” writes SLP Molly Beiting. Her experience reflects a concern voiced by some clinicians that lisp remediation receives limited emphasis in certain speech-language pathology graduate curricula, particularly given that lisping ranks among the most common speech disorders practitioners encounter in clinical settings.
This comprehensive guide addresses that educational gap by providing evidence-based protocols for assessing and treating various lisp types. Whether you’re an SLP seeking specialized training, a graduate student preparing for clinical practice, or a parent researching treatment options, you’ll find actionable guidance on differentiation, assessment techniques, intervention strategies, and professional development resources for lisp remediation.
What Is Lisping?
Lisping represents a functional speech disorder characterized by the inability to accurately articulate /s/ and /z/ sounds due to incorrect tongue placement during speech production. Functional speech disorders have no identifiable structural or neurological cause but often involve motor learning difficulties where incorrect articulation patterns become habituated during speech development.
The prevalence of lisping disorders in clinical practice remains substantial. Studies estimate that articulation disorders—including lisps—affect 8-13% of children, with lisps representing one of the most commonly encountered subtypes in speech-language pathology practice. This high incidence rate, combined with the disorder’s visibility in social interactions, makes lisp remediation a critical competency for practicing SLPs.
Beyond /s/ and /z/ sounds, some individuals experience difficulty with related phonemes, including /sh/, /ch/, and /j/, though these presentations occur less frequently in clinical populations. The disorder’s impact extends from mild articulation differences—barely perceptible in conversational speech—to more severe distortions that significantly affect intelligibility and may contribute to social or academic challenges.
Common Causes and Contributing Factors
While lisping is classified as a functional disorder, clinical observation has identified several potential contributing factors:
- Learned Misarticulation: The individual learned incorrect sound production patterns during language acquisition and requires systematic retraining to establish accurate articulation.
- Structural Variations: Jaw alignment irregularities or dental malocclusion can interfere with proper tongue positioning for sibilant sound production.
- Ankyloglossia (Tongue Tie): When the lingual frenulum is abnormally short or tight, tongue mobility becomes restricted, potentially interfering with the precise movements required for /s/ and /z/ articulation. Learn more about tongue tie and its impact on speech development.
- Orofacial Myofunctional Patterns: Atypical oral rest postures or swallowing patterns may establish habitual tongue positions that transfer to speech production.
In many pediatric cases, no clear etiological factor emerges during clinical assessment. These idiopathic presentations don’t preclude successful intervention—research demonstrates that systematic therapy can effectively establish correct articulation patterns regardless of whether underlying causes are identified.
Types of Lisps: Clinical Classification and Characteristics
Speech-language pathologists categorize lisps into four distinct types based on tongue placement patterns and resulting acoustic characteristics. Accurate differential diagnosis proves essential, as each type requires targeted intervention approaches. The following table provides a comprehensive comparison of lisp types encountered in clinical practice:
| Lisp Type | Tongue Placement | Acoustic Characteristics | Treatment Age | Developmental Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontal Lisp | Tongue protrudes between front teeth | Produces /th/ sound instead of /s/ (“thun” for “sun”) | 7-8 years | Often developmental; many children self-correct |
| Lateral Lisp | Air escapes over the sides of the tongue | Wet, slushy quality; excessive saliva sound | 4.5 years | Non-developmental; requires intervention |
| Palatal Lisp | Tongue contacts the soft palate/velum | Prolonged /h/ + /y/ combination sound | 3-4 years | Non-developmental; early intervention critical |
| Dental Lisp | Tongue pushes against (not between) teeth | Similar to frontal lisp, but with a different placement | 4.5 years | May be developmental; assess individual presentation |
Frontal Lisps
Frontal lisps represent the most commonly encountered lisp type in clinical practice. Individuals with frontal lisps push their tongue too far forward during /s/ and /z/ production, with the tongue tip protruding between the upper and lower front teeth. This placement pattern produces an auditory output resembling the voiceless dental fricative /th/, resulting in productions like “thun” instead of “sun” or “thoo” instead of “zoo.”
Many children naturally outgrow frontal lisps as oral motor coordination matures and permanent teeth emerge, which is why treatment protocols typically recommend waiting until ages 7-8 before initiating formal intervention. That said, certain presentations warrant earlier attention, particularly when intelligibility is significantly compromised or when co-occurring factors suggest underlying orofacial concerns.
Lateral Lisps
Lateral lisps present distinct challenges in remediation and represent a non-developmental pattern requiring professional intervention. In lateral lisp production, air escapes over one or both sides of the tongue rather than through the central groove. This aberrant airflow pattern creates a distinctive wet, slushy acoustic quality often described as sounding like excess saliva in the mouth.
The lateral lisp’s non-developmental status makes it particularly important to identify and treat early. Unlike frontal lisps, lateral patterns typically do not resolve without intervention—children rarely self-correct these placements spontaneously. Research indicates that earlier intervention (starting around 4.5 years) yields significantly better outcomes than delayed treatment approaches. The complexity of establishing correct lateral tongue bracing and central airflow channeling often requires intensive, systematic therapy protocols.
Palatal Lisps
Palatal lisps involve tongue-to-palate contact during sibilant production, with the tongue contacting the soft palate or velar region rather than maintaining the appropriate alveolar placement. Speech-language pathology specialist Caroline Bowen, PhD, describes the acoustic output as resembling a prolonged /h/ sound immediately followed by /y/, though this combination requires careful listening to identify accurately.
Like lateral lisps, palatal presentations are non-developmental and require therapeutic intervention. Treatment should begin between the ages of 3-4 to prevent pattern solidification as the child’s phonological system continues developing. The relatively young treatment age reflects both the pattern’s resistance to spontaneous correction and the potential for early establishment of correct articulatory gestures during formative speech development periods.
Dental Lisps
Dental lisps closely resemble frontal lisps in their auditory characteristics but differ in the specific tongue placement pattern. Rather than protruding between the teeth (interdental placement), the tongue pushes against the back surface of the upper or lower front teeth during /s/ and /z/ production. This subtle difference in placement can be challenging to identify through auditory analysis alone, requiring careful visual observation during assessment procedures.
The dental-frontal distinction carries clinical implications for treatment planning. While both may sound similar to untrained listeners, the motor planning and proprioceptive awareness training differ between the two patterns. Accurate differential diagnosis ensures that intervention targets the specific placement error rather than applying generic frontal lisp protocols that may not address the actual articulatory issue.
Differentiating Lisps from Tongue Thrust Patterns
Accurate differential diagnosis between lisping and tongue thrust proves critical for effective treatment planning, as these conditions require fundamentally different intervention approaches. While both involve atypical tongue positioning, tongue thrust represents an orofacial myofunctional disorder with implications extending beyond speech production to include swallowing patterns and dental development.
Tongue thrust—clinically termed “reverse swallow”—describes an orofacial muscular imbalance where the tongue moves forward in an exaggerated manner between or against the teeth. This pattern may manifest during speech production, swallowing, or even at rest, potentially contributing to orthodontic complications, including anterior open bite, overjet, and other dental malocclusions if left unaddressed.
Clinical Indicators of Tongue Thrust
When conducting differential diagnosis, clinicians should systematically evaluate for the following characteristic indicators of tongue thrust patterns:
- Lingual Protrusion During Multiple Phonemes: Tongue protrusion occurring not only during /s/ and /z/ but also extending to /t/, /d/, /n/, /l/, and potentially /sh/ productions suggests orofacial pattern involvement beyond isolated lisping.
- Atypical Oral Rest Posture: Open-mouth resting position with visible lip separation and/or anterior tongue positioning against or between teeth during quiet breathing or non-speaking activities.
- Perioral Tissue Changes: Chronic lip licking leading to cracked, chapped, or persistently dry lips, often accompanied by perioral dermatitis in more severe presentations.
- Obligatory Mouth Breathing: Persistent oral breathing patterns even in the absence of nasal congestion, allergies, or upper respiratory conditions that would explain the behavior.
- Anterior Swallow Pattern: Observable forward tongue movement during liquid or food swallowing, potentially with visible tongue-to-teeth or tongue-between-teeth contact during the swallow sequence.
The presence of multiple indicators from this constellation of symptoms strongly suggests tongue thrust rather than or in addition to a primary lisping disorder. This distinction matters because tongue thrust intervention focuses on reestablishing appropriate resting postures, swallowing patterns, and orofacial muscle balance rather than emphasizing articulation training alone.
Age Considerations and Referral Guidelines
Most children naturally outgrow tongue thrust patterns by age six as orofacial structures mature and swallowing patterns develop. If tongue thrust indicators persist beyond age six, initiating intervention becomes increasingly important to prevent dental complications and establish functional orofacial patterns before maladaptive habits solidify.
When tongue thrust is suspected, consider interdisciplinary consultation with orthodontists or orofacial myofunctional therapists who specialize in these patterns. This collaborative approach ensures comprehensive treatment addressing both the speech and structural components of the disorder. Simply treating the lisp through articulation therapy without addressing underlying myofunctional patterns often results in limited success or pattern recurrence following therapy completion.
Evidence-Based Treatment Approaches for Lisping
Each lisp type requires individualized intervention based on the specific tongue placement error, though fundamental treatment principles remain consistent across presentations. The protocols outlined below represent evidence-based approaches derived from clinical research and established best practices in speech-language pathology practice.
Systematic Treatment Progression
Effective lisp intervention follows a hierarchical progression from foundational awareness to functional communication integration. Treatment approaches for both pediatric and adult populations follow similar sequences, with adjustments made for cognitive-linguistic level and motivation rather than age alone.
Phase 1: Comprehensive Assessment
Begin by systematically testing the target sounds (/s/, /z/, and potentially /sh/, /ch/, /j/) in multiple phonetic contexts: word-initial position (“sun,” “zoo”), medial position (“lesson,” “busy”), and final position (“miss,” “buzz”). This comprehensive sampling reveals whether difficulties are consistent across contexts or position-specific, informing treatment planning decisions.
During assessment, carefully observe for evidence of all four lisp types and screen for potential tongue thrust indicators. Document any words or contexts where the client produces target sounds correctly—these “islands of success” provide valuable starting points for establishing accurate placement patterns during intervention. Standardized word lists specific to lateral and dental lisp assessment can guide this process systematically.
Phase 2: Auditory Awareness Development
Many individuals with lisping disorders demonstrate limited awareness of their own production errors. Before attempting to modify articulation, establish robust auditory discrimination of correct versus incorrect productions. Use modeling techniques where you produce words both with and without the lisp, asking the client to identify which productions are accurate.
Video recording proves particularly valuable during this phase. Recording the client during connected speech and playing back examples allows them to observe and hear their own productions from a listener’s perspective. This external awareness often accelerates progress by making the abstract concept of “correct tongue placement” more concrete and observable.
Phase 3: Establishing Correct Tongue Placement
This phase represents the core of the Lisp intervention. If the assessment revealed any contexts where the client produces target sounds accurately, return to those successful productions and help them develop conscious awareness of what their tongue is doing differently. Heightening proprioceptive awareness of correct placement provides an internal reference point for self-monitoring.
For clients without any accurate productions, use tactile cuing, visual models, and systematic shaping techniques to establish the target placement. Describe the target position explicitly: “Keep your tongue tip behind your top teeth. Make a small groove in the middle of your tongue. Send the air straight down that groove.” Use a mirror so clients can visually monitor tongue position during attempts.
Once accurate production emerges in isolation, practice sustained /s/ productions to establish motor memory and stability before progressing to linguistic contexts. This phase develops proprioceptive awareness—the internal sense of where the tongue is positioned and how it moves—which enables clients to self-monitor their articulation without relying on external feedback.
Phase 4: Sound Stabilization in Structured Contexts
Systematically progress through increasingly complex linguistic contexts: isolated sound production → syllables → single words → phrases → sentences. Within word-level practice, move from initial position to final position to medial position, as initial /s/ typically proves easiest to establish and maintain.
Extensive practice at each level proves essential. Research on motor learning indicates that high-frequency, systematic practice with immediate feedback yields optimal outcomes for establishing new motor patterns. Many clients require hundreds or thousands of accurate productions before the new pattern becomes stable enough to transfer to conversational speech.
Phase 5: Generalization to Conversational Speech
The ultimate goal of intervention involves accurate, automatic production during spontaneous communication. This phase requires systematic attention to self-monitoring and error detection as the client works to maintain accuracy while managing the cognitive-linguistic demands of natural conversation.
Begin with highly structured conversational contexts (reading aloud, describing pictures, answering predictable questions) before progressing to spontaneous conversation. Teaching self-correction strategies—helping clients recognize when productions are inaccurate and make online corrections—supports long-term maintenance and reduces the need for external monitoring.
Determining Optimal Treatment Timing
One of the most common questions parents and early-career SLPs ask concerns appropriate timing for initiating lisp intervention. The answer depends critically on the lisp type, as developmental trajectories differ substantially across the four categories. The following table provides evidence-based guidelines for treatment timing decisions:
| Lisp Type | Recommended Start Age | Clinical Rationale | Developmental Pattern | Intervention Urgency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frontal Lisp | 7-8 years | Many resolve spontaneously as permanent dentition emerges; oral motor coordination continues maturing through age 7 | Often developmental | Low to Moderate |
| Lateral Lisp | 4.5 years | Non-developmental pattern; early intervention prevents solidification; difficult to remediate in older children/adults | Non-developmental | High |
| Palatal Lisp | 3-4 years | Non-developmental; atypical placement affects multiple phonemes; pattern becomes more resistant with age | Non-developmental | High |
| Dental Lisp | 4.5 years | May be developmental but warrants earlier treatment if accompanied by other indicators; prevents pattern establishment | Variable | Moderate |
Note: Treatment age recommendations represent general clinical guidelines based on typical developmental patterns and research evidence. Individual assessment should always guide treatment decisions, as some children may benefit from earlier or later intervention depending on specific presenting factors, severity, and functional impact.
Critical Distinction: Developmental vs. Non-Developmental Patterns
The developmental status of different lisp types fundamentally influences treatment timing recommendations. Lateral and palatal lisps are non-developmental, meaning children won’t spontaneously outgrow these patterns through maturation alone. Early identification and intervention for these types proves critical—the “wait and see” approach appropriate for some frontal lisps can be detrimental when applied to lateral or palatal presentations.
This distinction carries important implications for parent counseling. When parents of a 3-year-old with a frontal lisp express concern, reassurance, and watchful waiting may be appropriate; however, parents of a 3-year-old with a lateral or palatal lisp need clear guidance that intervention won’t just be beneficial—it’s necessary, and earlier is better.
Indicators for Earlier Intervention
Even for frontal lisps where typical recommendations suggest waiting until ages 7-8, certain presentations warrant earlier attention. Hindy Lubinsky, MS, CCC-SLP, director of the Graduate Program in Speech-Language Pathology at Touro College, identifies several clinical indicators suggesting the need for earlier intervention:
- Hearing Status: Has the child’s hearing been comprehensively evaluated? Unidentified hearing loss can interfere with auditory feedback mechanisms essential for self-correction of articulation patterns.
- Intelligibility Impact: Is overall speech intelligibility significantly affected? When lisping substantially impairs communication effectiveness, earlier intervention may be warranted regardless of age.
- Phonological Breadth: Are multiple phonemes affected, or is the difficulty isolated to /s/ and /z/? Widespread articulation difficulties suggest more significant concerns requiring earlier attention than isolated /s/ distortion.
- Oral Motor Function: Does the child demonstrate general oral motor difficulties during eating? “Sloppy eating,” inadequate lip closure during chewing, or tongue protrusion during swallowing suggest broader orofacial concerns.
- Orofacial Strength and Coordination: Can the child effectively use lips during eating? Can they lick food from their upper lip? These functional tasks reveal orofacial motor capabilities relevant to speech production.
- Sustained Oral Postures: Can the child close their teeth and maintain that closure with the tongue inside for a 5-count? Inability to maintain appropriate oral postures may indicate low muscle tone.
- Respiratory Patterns: Does the child breathe primarily through their mouth even when not congested? Chronic mouth breathing at rest often coexists with atypical oral postures affecting speech.
- Medical History: Does the child experience recurring upper respiratory illnesses? Chronic respiratory issues can interfere with both oral breathing patterns and general development, potentially warranting earlier speech intervention.
Several indicators on this list—particularly oral motor difficulties, chronic mouth breathing, and inability to maintain oral postures—suggest low orofacial muscle tone. When hypotonia contributes to lisping, addressing the underlying tone and strength issues often resolves the articulation concerns as a secondary benefit. Early identification and treatment of these foundational issues provides broader developmental benefits beyond speech production alone.
Chronic respiratory issues and persistent mouth breathing may indicate medical conditions—enlarged adenoids, allergies, or other upper airway concerns—requiring medical evaluation before or concurrent with speech intervention. When these patterns are identified, consider referring to the child’s pediatrician or an otolaryngologist for a comprehensive assessment before finalizing treatment planning decisions.
Comprehensive Assessment and Diagnosis Protocols
Thorough assessment forms the foundation for effective intervention planning. Beyond identifying the presence of a lisp, clinicians must determine the specific type, severity level, phonetic contexts affected, and potential contributing factors. This comprehensive diagnostic picture informs individualized treatment approaches and establishes baseline data for measuring progress.
Standardized Assessment Procedures
Begin with systematic sampling of target phonemes across multiple phonetic contexts. Create or utilize standardized word lists containing /s/, /z/, /sh/, /ch/, and /j/ in initial, medial, and final word positions. Document whether productions are consistently distorted, inconsistently distorted, or accurately produced in specific contexts.
Audio or video recording proves invaluable during assessment. Recordings allow for repeated listening during differential diagnosis, facilitate tracking progress across therapy sessions, and provide objective documentation for families and referring providers. Many clients and families appreciate hearing recorded samples demonstrating progress from baseline through treatment phases.
Contextual Analysis and Stimulability Testing
Identify any “islands of correct production”—specific words, phonetic contexts, or speech rates where the client produces target sounds accurately. These contexts provide crucial information about the client’s capability for accurate production and serve as excellent starting points for establishing new patterns during intervention.
Conduct formal stimulability testing by providing maximal cues (visual models, verbal descriptions of placement, tactile cues) and determining whether the client can approximate or achieve accurate production with support. High stimulability generally predicts more favorable treatment outcomes and may suggest a shorter intervention timeline.
Differential Diagnosis Considerations
Systematically evaluate for factors beyond the lisp itself:
- Screen for tongue thrust indicators (multiple phonemes affected, open mouth rest posture, atypical swallowing patterns)
- Assess overall oral motor skills through non-speech tasks (sustained postures, range of motion, strength, coordination)
- Evaluate structural adequacy (dentition, palatal contour, lingual frenulum length, and mobility)
- Consider hearing screening if not recently completed
- Document respiratory patterns and nasal patency
This comprehensive evaluation ensures that the intervention addresses all relevant factors rather than focusing narrowly on articulation training while overlooking contributing conditions requiring separate or concurrent attention.
Professional Development and Continuing Education Resources
Some clinicians report that lisp remediation receives limited emphasis in graduate training, echoing Molly Beiting’s observation about potential curriculum gaps. Fortunately, robust continuing education options exist for developing specialized competency in lisp assessment and intervention. Building expertise in articulation disorder treatment requires ongoing professional development beyond initial graduate training.
While no formal specialty certification exists specifically for lisp treatment, the resources below provide evidence-based training for clinicians seeking to enhance their skills in this area. These options range from brief webinars to comprehensive multi-day courses, accommodating various learning preferences and schedule constraints.
Note: Course availability, pricing, and formats may change over time. Verify that any continuing education resources remain current and accessible before registration. Contact course providers directly to confirm ASHA CEU approval status and current offerings.
On-Site Professional Training Courses
Experienced clinicians periodically offer intensive on-site courses focusing on challenging articulation cases, including lisp presentations. These programs provide hands-on practice, case study analysis, and direct interaction with expert instructors. While they may require travel, many employers or school districts will sponsor attendance or arrange to bring courses on-site for staff training.
Practical Therapy Techniques for Challenging Articulation Cases: Frontal Lisp, Lateral Lisp, and Distorted “R”
Instructor: Char Boshart, MS, CCC-SLP
Offers systematic protocols forthe differential diagnosis and treatment of difficult-to-remediate articulation patterns. Emphasizes evidence-based techniques with immediate clinical application.
Oral Placement Therapy: Clinical Implications for Tongue Thrust and Lisps
Instructor: Robyn Merkel-Walsh, MA, CCC-SLP
Focuses on orofacial myofunctional approaches relevant to both tongue thrust and lisp presentations. Also available as an online self-study for schedule flexibility.
Online Courses and Webinars
Digital learning platforms provide accessible, often more affordable alternatives to in-person training. Many offer ASHA-approved continuing education units (CEUs) upon completion. Online formats allow clinicians to learn at their own pace while managing clinical schedules and other professional responsibilities.
Effective Evaluation and Intervention Procedures for Frontal and Lateral Lisp Disorders
Instructor: Christine Ristuccia, MS, CCC-SLP
Format: FREE online course
Comprehensive introduction covering assessment protocols and intervention strategies for the two most common lisp types encountered in clinical practice.
Techniques for the Lateral Lisp
Instructor: Pam Marshalla, MA, CCC-SLP
Format: Online continuing education course
Deep dive into the complexities of lateral lisp remediation from a recognized expert in articulation disorders. Particularly valuable given the lateral lisp’s resistance to traditional treatment approaches.
Frontal Lisp, Lateral Lisp
Instructor: Pam Marshalla, MA, CCC-SLP
Format: Comprehensive online course
Systematic coverage of both frontal and lateral presentations with detailed intervention protocols and troubleshooting strategies for treatment-resistant cases.
Clinical Materials and Session Planning Resources
Many experienced clinicians share therapy materials, session plans, and activities through educational platforms. These ready-to-use resources can significantly reduce preparation time while ensuring evidence-based intervention approaches.
Lisp-Related Therapy Materials
Developer: Karen Krogg, MS, CCC-SLP (The Pedi Speechie)
Available through the Teachers Pay Teachers platform
Developmentally appropriate activities and materials designed for pediatric populations.
Remediating Frontal Lisp Starter Packet
Developer: Molly Beiting, MS, CCC-SLP
Available through the Teachers Pay Teachers platform
Complete a 4-week treatment plan including structured activities, home practice materials, and progress monitoring tools. Born from Beiting’s experience addressing curriculum gaps in SLP graduate programs.
Digital Tools and Applications
Lisp Therapy App
Developer: Abitalk
Platform: iOS/Android
An interactive application providing structured practice activities for children working on lisp correction. Includes visual feedback and gamification elements to maintain engagement during home practice.
Professional Reference Texts
Comprehensive textbooks provide theoretical foundations alongside practical protocols, serving as enduring professional resources throughout your career. These texts offer detailed coverage that surpasses brief webinar or course formats.
Frontal Lisp, Lateral Lisp: Procedures for Diagnosis and Treatment
Author: Pam Marshalla, MA, CCC-SLP
Considered the definitive professional reference for lisp intervention, combining research foundations with step-by-step clinical protocols. Addresses differential diagnosis, treatment planning, and problem-solving for challenging cases.
Help Me Talk Right
Author: Mirla G. Raz, MS, CCC-SLP
Practical guide emphasizing functional communication approaches and family involvement in intervention. Includes reproducible materials and parent education resources.
Developing Expertise Through Practice and Contribution
As you develop proficiency in lisp assessment and intervention, consider contributing to the broader professional knowledge base. Following Molly Beiting’s example, many clinicians share clinical insights through professional blogs, conference presentations, or by publishing therapy materials. These contributions benefit the field while establishing your expertise in specialized areas of practice.
For clinicians early in their SLP career path, building competency in lisp treatment requires intentional skill development beyond graduate training. The resources outlined above provide systematic pathways for acquiring the specialized knowledge necessary for effective clinical practice with this common yet often inadequately addressed disorder.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a lisp considered a speech impediment?
Yes, a lisp is classified as a functional speech impediment—specifically, an articulation disorder affecting the accurate production of /s/ and /z/ sounds. Unlike organic speech disorders with identifiable physical causes, lisps are considered functional because they often occur without clear structural abnormalities. However, lisps can significantly impact communication effectiveness and may affect social interactions, academic performance, or professional opportunities depending on severity. The disorder affects approximately 23% of patients seen by speech-language pathologists and responds well to appropriate intervention.
What causes lisping in children and adults?
Lisping typically results from incorrect tongue placement learned during early speech development, though several factors can contribute. Common causes include learned misarticulation patterns (incorrect sound production habits), structural variations such as jaw misalignment or dental malocclusion, ankyloglossia (tongue tie) restricting tongue mobility, and atypical orofacial muscle patterns. In many cases, no clear cause is identified, but this doesn’t prevent successful treatment. Adults may have persistent lisps from childhood that were never addressed or may develop lisps following dental work, oral surgery, or neurological changes.
What’s the difference between a frontal lisp and a lateral lisp?
A frontal lisp occurs when the tongue protrudes between the front teeth during /s/ and /z/ production, creating a sound resembling /th/ (“thun” instead of “sun”). Many children naturally outgrow frontal lisps as oral motor skills mature. A lateral lisp, by contrast, happens when air escapes over the sides of the tongue rather than through the center, producing a wet, slushy sound quality. Lateral lisps are non-developmental—children don’t outgrow them—and require earlier intervention (typically starting around age 4.5) because they’re more difficult to remediate than frontal patterns and become increasingly resistant to treatment with age.
At what age should you start treating a child’s lisp?
Treatment timing depends critically on lisp type. Frontal lisps, which are often developmental, typically warrant treatment around ages 7-8 if they haven’t self-corrected. Lateral and palatal lisps, however, require much earlier intervention—lateral lisps should be treated starting around age 4.5, while palatal lisps warrant intervention between ages 3-4. These non-developmental patterns don’t resolve without intervention and become more difficult to treat with age. Dental lisps generally should be addressed around age 4.5. Earlier intervention may be appropriate for any lisp type if intelligibility is significantly affected, multiple sounds are impacted, or signs of low oral muscle tone or tongue thrust are present.
Can adults fix a lisp, or is it too late for treatment?
Adults can achieve successful lisp correction through speech therapy when provided with consistent, individualized treatment. While correction may require more intensive effort than childhood intervention due to the need to override long-established motor patterns, the fundamental treatment protocols remain similar regardless of age. Adult learners often progress quickly through awareness and cognitive understanding phases, but typically need more repetitions to establish automatic production of new articulatory patterns. Motivation typically runs high in adult clients seeking treatment, which positively influences outcomes. Working with a speech-language pathologist experienced in adult articulation therapy yields the best results.
How long does lisp therapy typically take?
Treatment duration varies substantially based on lisp type, severity, age at intervention start, practice consistency, and individual learning factors. Frontal lisps in children often respond within 8-16 weeks of consistent therapy, though some cases may resolve more quickly, while others require additional time. Lateral lisps typically require longer intervention periods—often 6-12 months or more—due to the complexity of establishing correct lateral tongue bracing and central airflow patterns. Adult treatment timelines vary significantly depending on pattern entrenchment and practice intensity, but generally extend somewhat longer than childhood intervention due to the need to override established motor habits. Consistent home practice between therapy sessions significantly accelerates progress across all age groups. Children who begin treatment at the recommended ages for their specific lisp type generally achieve faster resolution than those whose treatment begins later, though outcomes depend on multiple interacting factors.
Is tongue thrust the same thing as a lisp?
No, tongue thrust and lisping are distinct conditions, though they can co-occur and are sometimes confused. A lisp is an articulation disorder affecting specific speech sounds (/s/ and /z/), while tongue thrust is an orofacial myofunctional disorder involving atypical swallowing patterns and oral rest postures. In tongue thrust, the tongue pushes forward between or against teeth during swallowing, at rest, or during speech production of multiple phonemes—not just /s/ and /z/. Tongue thrust can contribute to dental problems if untreated and requires different intervention focusing on reestablishing appropriate swallowing patterns and oral postures rather than articulation training alone. If tongue thrust causes a lisp, treating only the articulation often proves unsuccessful without addressing the underlying myofunctional pattern.
Key Takeaways
- Lisp classification matters: Accurate identification of lisp type (frontal, lateral, palatal, or dental) is essential for treatment planning, as each requires specific intervention approaches and different timing recommendations for optimal outcomes.
- Developmental status determines urgency: Lateral and palatal lisps are non-developmental patterns requiring early intervention (ages 3-4.5), while many frontal lisps resolve spontaneously and can wait until ages 7-8 for treatment initiation if needed.
- Differential diagnosis prevents treatment failure: Distinguishing lisps from tongue thrust is critical—when tongue thrust contributes to the lisp, addressing only articulation without treating underlying myofunctional patterns typically results in limited success or relapse.
- Treatment follows systematic progression: Evidence-based intervention moves hierarchically from auditory awareness and placement establishment through structured practice contexts to conversational generalization, with each phase building on previous achievements.
- Professional development fills curriculum gaps: Many graduate programs provide limited training in lisp remediation, making continuing education courses, specialized workshops, and clinical mentorship essential for developing competency in this common disorder.
- Age is not a barrier to success: While earlier intervention generally yields faster results, adults can achieve successful lisp correction through speech therapy when motivated and provided with systematic, evidence-based treatment protocols.
- Emerson College - Master's in Speech-Language Pathology online - Prepare to become an SLP in as few as 20 months. No GRE required. Scholarships available.
- Grand Canyon University - Online Master of Science in Speech-Language Pathology. - This STEM program focuses on training aspiring speech-language pathologists to offer compassionate, effective services to individuals with communication disorders
- Arizona State University - Online - Online Bachelor of Science in Speech and Hearing Science - Designed to prepare graduates to work in behavioral health settings or transition to graduate programs in speech-language pathology and audiology.
- NYU Steinhardt - NYU Steinhardt's Master of Science in Communicative Sciences and Disorders online - ASHA-accredited. Bachelor's degree required. Graduate prepared to pursue licensure.
- Pepperdine University - Embark on a transformative professional and personal journey in the online Master of Science in Speech-Language Pathology program from Pepperdine University. Our program brings together rigorous academics, research-driven faculty teaching, and robust clinical experiences, all wrapped within our Christian mission to serve our communities and improve the lives of others.
Advance Your SLP Expertise
Ready to expand your clinical competencies? Whether you’re pursuing graduate education or seeking specialized training, explore master’s programs in speech-language pathology offering comprehensive preparation in articulation disorders, or discover continuing education opportunities to enhance your treatment of challenging cases.
For parents and individuals seeking treatment: Connect with certified speech-language pathologists specializing in articulation disorders. Learn about ASHA certification requirements to ensure you’re working with qualified professionals who can provide evidence-based lisp intervention.