Student reviewing multiple university acceptance letters while comparing SLP graduate programs on laptop spreadsheet

SLP Graduate Programs With High Acceptance Rates | 2025

Written by Sarah Keller, Last Updated: November 27, 2025

Quick Answer

SLP programs with higher acceptance rates are typically found in Western states (Wyoming, Montana, the Dakotas), Texas private institutions, and newer programs building enrollment. While the per-application rate is around 45%, students applying to 8-12 programs report high overall acceptance success. Programs in less populated areas often accept 50-85% of applicants.

Featured Programs:

If you’re researching SLP graduate program acceptance rates, you’re probably feeling some anxiety about the admissions process. You’re not alone. The field is competitive, and stories about single-digit acceptance rates at specific California State University programs can make getting into any program seem impossible.

Here’s the reality: acceptance rates across SLP programs range from under 5% to over 85%. While some students focus on top-ranked SLP programs, others need to understand why some programs are more accessible and how to target applications strategically. This guide breaks down which programs have higher acceptance rates, what factors make them more accessible, and how to build an application strategy that maximizes your chances of admission.

The good news? If you’re committed to becoming an SLP and willing to be flexible about location, there’s a strong likelihood of acceptance with a strategic approach.

Understanding SLP Graduate Program Acceptance Rates

According to ASHA’s 2024 Communication Sciences and Disorders Education Survey, approximately 45.3% of applications to master’s programs in speech-language pathology were offered admission for the 2023-2024 academic year. That number can feel discouraging until you understand what it actually means.

The 45% figure represents a per-application acceptance rate. Most students apply to 8-12 programs. When you factor in students applying broadly, the vast majority of committed applicants who apply strategically do get accepted somewhere.

The acceptance landscape varies dramatically based on several factors. California State University programs are notoriously competitive. Programs like CSU Fullerton, CSU Long Beach, and CSU Los Angeles regularly report acceptance rates in the single digits, making them among the most selective in the country. Meanwhile, programs in less populated states and private institutions often accept 50-70% of applicants.

What Makes Some Programs More Accessible?

Understanding why specific programs have higher acceptance rates helps you target your applications effectively. Several factors influence program accessibility:

Geographic location plays a significant role. Programs in rural areas or smaller cities simply receive fewer applications because fewer students want to relocate there. A program in Minot, North Dakota, will naturally receive less competition than one in Los Angeles or New York City.

Program size matters significantly. A program with a cohort of 40-50 students can accept more applicants than one with only 20-25 seats. Larger programs have more flexibility in their admissions decisions.

Institutional type affects accessibility patterns. Private programs with higher tuition often have higher acceptance rates because fewer students can afford them. Public universities, especially those with substantial in-state tuition benefits, tend to be more competitive.

Application volume varies based on factors like CSDCAS participation, application deadlines, and program visibility. Programs with later deadlines or those that don’t use the centralized application system may receive fewer total applications.

Newer programs building their enrollment often have higher acceptance rates as they work to fill cohorts and establish their reputation. These programs in CAA candidacy status are entirely legitimate options.

Programs With Higher Acceptance Rates by Region

Regional patterns emerge clearly when examining SLP program accessibility. Here’s where you’ll find programs that accept a higher percentage of applicants.

Western States: Wyoming, Montana, and the Dakotas

Programs in the less populated Western states consistently show higher acceptance rates. These programs offer excellent training with less competition for seats.

The University of Wyoming offers a Two-Step program specifically designed for students who need leveling courses. They provide provisional acceptance for applicants with a 3.0 GPA, making this an accessible option for career changers or those without a CSD undergraduate background.

The University of South Dakota requires a 3.0 GPA in its communication disorders courses for eligibility. Their program serves students throughout the region with solid outcomes.

Minot State University in North Dakota reports impressive statistics on their program website: a 97% Praxis pass rate and 100% post-graduation employment. These outcomes demonstrate that accessible programs can deliver excellent results.

The University of Montana serves students throughout the Pacific Northwest with competitive but accessible admissions compared to programs in larger metropolitan areas.

An essential benefit for applicants to Western programs: the Western Regional Graduate Program (WRGP) allows residents of 17 western states and territories to request reduced tuition rates at participating schools. Participating schools and tuition benefits can change, so verify current eligibility on the WRGP website before applying.

Texas Programs

Texas has 17 SLP graduate programs, and several accept a substantially higher percentage of applicants than the national average.

ProgramReported Acceptance RateNotes
Abilene Christian University85%+Private, faith-based institution
Hardin-Simmons University~60%Private, smaller cohort
University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences~55%Health sciences focused
University of North Texas~45%Public university option
University of Texas at El Paso~42%Border region, bilingual opportunities

The private Texas programs tend to have higher tuition but offer more accessible admissions. Public programs like UNT and UTEP provide more affordable options while still maintaining above-average acceptance rates. Verify current rates directly with programs, as these figures can change year to year.

California Programs (Relatively More Accessible)

California is generally one of the most competitive states for SLP admissions. The CSU system programs regularly see acceptance rates under 10%. That said, some California programs are notably more accessible.

The University of Southern California has historically reported higher acceptance rates than public California programs. The catch? It’s a private program with significantly higher tuition than public alternatives. For students who can manage the cost, it offers excellent training with less competitive admissions.

San Jose State University accepts a higher percentage of applicants than most CSU programs, making it one of the more accessible CSU options.

CSU Sacramento and CSU Monterey Bay both accept above-average percentages of applicants compared to other California public programs.

Private California options such as California Baptist University and the University of the Pacific offer alternatives to the highly competitive CSU system.

New York Programs

New York offers several programs with acceptance rates above 50%:

Touro College accepts a higher percentage of applicants with a target cohort of around 53 students. The larger cohort size contributes to their higher acceptance rate.

SUNY Plattsburgh has reported acceptance rates above 65% with a smaller target cohort of 20 students. Its location in upstate New York means less competition than programs in New York City.

St. John’s University, Katz School at Yeshiva University, and Hofstra University round out the more accessible New York options, with reported rates generally above 50%.

Online SLP Programs: A Different Competitive Landscape

Online SLP programs have become increasingly popular, offering flexibility for working professionals and students who can’t relocate. Their acceptance rates vary significantly, and they tend to cost more than in-person public programs.

Programs like Emerson College and NYU Steinhardt have eliminated GRE requirements and adopted holistic review. This can benefit applicants whose strengths don’t show up in standardized test scores or whose GPAs don’t reflect their potential.

Baylor University offers an accelerated online option with strong outcomes, including program-reported Praxis pass rates near 90%.

Keep in mind that even with online coursework, you’ll need to complete clinical practicum hours in person. Programs typically help students arrange placements near their home location, but this requires coordination and planning.

The cost tradeoff is fundamental. Online programs, especially those from private institutions, often cost more than in-state public options. A program with a 60% acceptance rate and a total cost of $80,000 may not be the better choice than a 30% acceptance rate program at $40,000. Use our program comparison tool to evaluate total costs and outcomes before making decisions.

Programs in Candidacy Status: A Legitimate Option

Newer programs working toward full CAA accreditation hold “candidacy” status. Some applicants worry about whether these programs are legitimate. They absolutely are.

According to ASHA standards, programs in CAA candidacy status meet all accreditation requirements and are simply completing the process. Graduates from candidacy programs are fully eligible for ASHA certification and state licensure. There’s no professional disadvantage to attending a candidacy program.

These programs often have higher acceptance rates as they work to build enrollment and establish their reputation. Metropolitan State University of Denver, for example, currently holds candidacy status and admits 24 students per cohort. They also participate in the WRGP, allowing out-of-state students from western states to pay reduced tuition.

Before enrolling in a candidacy program, ask these questions: What’s the timeline for achieving full accreditation? What happens to students if certification isn’t granted? What are the program’s Praxis pass rates and employment outcomes for previous cohorts? Always verify current accreditation status using ASHA EdFind before committing.

Application Strategies for Average-Stat Applicants

If your GPA is below 3.5 or you’re concerned about your competitiveness, these evidence-based strategies can improve your odds.

Target the Right Programs

Use ASHA EdFind to search for programs whose GPA range overlaps with your GPA. Look for schools that list GPA ranges rather than just minimums. A program that lists “3.0-3.8 accepted GPA range” is telling you they take students across that spectrum.

Focus your applications on programs where your stats meet or exceed their typical admitted student profile. This doesn’t mean you shouldn’t apply to reach schools, but make sure your list includes realistic options.

Apply Broadly: 8-12 Programs

Applying broadly increases your chances of acceptance. Students who apply to 8-12 programs, including a mix of reaches, targets, and safety schools, see dramatically better outcomes than those who apply to only 3-4.

Include at least 2-3 programs where your stats exceed their typical admitted student profile. These “safety schools” provide peace of mind and often lead to acceptance offers that boost your confidence during the wait.

Strengthen Non-GPA Components

Your application is more than your GPA. Admissions committees rate personal statements numerically, and a compelling statement can significantly impact decisions. Common mistakes include exceeding page limits, grammatical errors, and mentioning professors who no longer work at the institution. Have multiple people review your statement.

Strong letters of recommendation from professors or supervisors who know you well carry significant weight. Give your recommenders plenty of time and provide them with information about your goals and the programs you’re applying to.

Clinical observation hours, volunteer work, SLPA experience, and research involvement demonstrate your commitment to the field. These experiences also give you material for a stronger personal statement.

While many programs have dropped GRE requirements, submitting strong scores can help offset a lower GPA at programs that still accept them. Check each program’s policies.

Consider Post-Baccalaureate Coursework

If your undergraduate GPA is low, completing post-baccalaureate CSD courses with strong grades can significantly strengthen your application. Admissions committees often weigh recent academic performance heavily.

Applicants regularly report gaining admission after earning a 3.8-4.0 in post-bacc coursework, even with overall undergraduate GPAs in the 2.7-2.9 range. This pathway takes additional time and money, but it works.

What “Less Competitive” Doesn’t Mean

It’s important to understand that higher acceptance rates don’t indicate lower quality. Programs are “less competitive” primarily because of factors like location and cost, not because they provide inferior training.

Look at the outcomes: Minot State University in North Dakota reports a 97% Praxis pass rate and a 100% employment rate after graduation, according to its program data. These numbers match or exceed many highly competitive programs.

The reality is that employers care about your certification, not your program’s acceptance rate. Once you have your CCC-SLP, the focus shifts to your clinical skills, experience, and fit for specific positions. No one asks about your program’s selectivity during job interviews.

That said, always verify that any program you’re considering holds CAA accreditation or candidacy status. Browse our directory of CAA-accredited SLP graduate programs or use ASHA EdFind to confirm accreditation status before applying.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I get into SLP grad school with a 3.0-3.2 GPA?
 

Yes. Many students with GPAs in this range successfully gain admission, especially when applying to programs in Texas, the Western states, the Midwest, and online programs. The key is to apply to 8-12 programs and target schools where your GPA falls within their accepted range. Strengthening other application components, such as your personal statement, and gaining relevant experience, also help offset a lower GPA.

Which SLP programs don’t require the GRE?
 

An increasing number of programs have eliminated GRE requirements. As of 2025, programs including Emerson College, NYU Steinhardt, Baylor University, and many others have dropped the GRE requirement. Check ASHA EdFind or individual program websites for current requirements, as policies change frequently.

Are newer programs or those in candidacy status legitimate?
 

Yes. Programs in CAA candidacy status meet all accreditation requirements and are simply completing the process. Graduates are fully eligible for ASHA certification and state licensure. These programs can be excellent options and often have higher acceptance rates as enrollment grows. Always verify a program’s current accreditation status using ASHA EdFind before applying.

How many SLP grad schools should I apply to?
 

Most successful applicants apply to 8-12 programs. This should include a mix of reach schools (programs where your stats are below average), target schools (where your stats match their typical admitted student), and safety schools (where your stats exceed their typical admitted student). Applying broadly dramatically improves your overall acceptance success.

Do online SLP programs have different acceptance rates?
 

Online program acceptance rates vary significantly. Some, like specific private institution programs, may be more accessible, while others remain competitive. Online programs tend to be more expensive than in-state public options. They offer flexibility but still require in-person clinical practicum hours. Consider both acceptance rates and total cost when evaluating online programs.

Does it matter which SLP program I attend for my career?
 

In the SLP field, program prestige matters far less than in some other professions. Employers care about your CCC-SLP certification, your clinical skills, and your fit for the position. A program with a 70% acceptance rate that produces graduates who pass the Praxis and find employment is just as valuable as a highly selective program. Focus on finding a CAA-accredited program that fits your budget, location needs, and career goals.

Key Takeaways

  • The national per-application acceptance rate is approximately 45%, but students who apply to 8-12 programs report high overall acceptance success.
  • Programs in Western states (Wyoming, Montana, the Dakotas), Texas private institutions, and newer programs in candidacy status typically have higher acceptance rates.
  • Higher acceptance rates don’t indicate lower quality. Accessible programs often have excellent Praxis pass rates and employment outcomes.
  • If your GPA is below 3.5, target programs where your stats fall within their accepted range and strengthen other application components.
  • Always verify CAA accreditation or candidacy status using ASHA EdFind before applying to any program.
  • Employers care about your certification and clinical skills, not your program’s selectivity or prestige.

Find Your Path Forward

Ready to start comparing programs? Use our comparison tool to evaluate CAA-accredited programs by cost, outcomes, and fit for your goals.

Compare SLP Programs

author avatar
Sarah Keller
Sarah M. Keller, MS, CCC-SLP, is a licensed speech-language pathologist with 15 years of experience in pediatric clinics and university training programs. She earned her master’s in speech-language pathology from a CAHPS-accredited program in the Midwest and supervised clinical practicums for online and hybrid SLP cohorts. Sarah now advises students on graduate school applications, clinical fellowships, and state licensure. She lives in Colorado with her family and golden retriever.